Let not the one hand see what the other doeth: On the one hand, morality seeks to purge itself of the animal; on the other hand, purging is animal. How does one dominate a reflex for domination?



*



He who hesitates often wins the race of not being wrong.  With a little reticence the paralysis of Will can even claim genius. Given the absurdity of the many “opportunities” we pursue, in the comparison, it may even be genius to have just enough intelligence to be confused.

*


Observation depends upon the inversion of the power ratio of self-to-deed: the ego must stop itself to see the crack in consciousness and remain small enough to secure the leverage.  


*



Is it perhaps due to natural selection that our youth often crave “wicked” symbolism? Intelligence is not necessarily a moral event, but shouldn’t morality necessarily require our intelligent inspection of values? And if Morality has a duty to proceed intelligently, what do we call it when it outpaces our listeners' definition?  From their perspective, we double the sin: because their confidence in their moral sensibility is nonetheless unintelligible, they take the “incomprehensible” that exists beyond that sensibility as "our immorality" and compound it with what is rationally intelligible, as "our intent."  Fortunately, the sensibilities of our youth will carry some of the messages into the next age.
   

Popular posts from this blog

A valuable book, A Human Strategy, aphorism 387

387 A valuable book may be torn to pieces without diminishing the human spirit, just so long as the words have already been read and understood.  To feel the loss of the book — at its material destruction, even though one had already digested its contents fully and had aligned oneself toward its overall direction — is evidence that one values the non-human being over human becoming , the static thing over the dynamic process .  In response to the fear of our unknowable future we would rather freeze ourselves into a single stage of growth at the expense of the entire metamorphosis. A Human Strategy ** The Mechanics of Virtue ** Post-Atheism
Read more
A benefactor's Moral Guide: what do you want that will not result in your ultimate dishonor?      ****    Meditation: "How do I get back to where I want to be?"
Read more

A theory of art

Interest is not in what you see. It’s in what you don’t see. It is sensed incompleteness completed reflexively by the spectator. It is a conflict in the otherwise imperceptible feeling that a sensory organ is “inadequate” … a mastery of scratching irritations, an “I” … “the” I. We love art the most when we scratch ourselves with what we view.  Art is valued at the interest that the passion from the incompletes in the work is instantly and successful satisfied by what the lover needs to sense … every time it senses the art.  A Human Strategy ** The Mechanics of Virtue ** Post-Atheism
Read more