Inhibition, The Mechanics of Virtue, Matt Berry, aphorism 65
65 Wouldn’t a private honesty which did not compromise itself in public be indistinguishable from uninhibited behavior? And wouldn’t such a person be indistinguishable from an idiot? And then we must consider the alternative: inhibited behavior would be indistinguishable from dishonesty – one does not do what one thinks . However, Inhibition is required in any attempt at self-control Conscious thought ... the attempt to understand and guide action is anything but uninhibited. Do self-control and wisdom require public dishonesty? A Human Strategy ** The Mechanics of Virtue ** Post-Atheism