Beware philosophical happiness: If the ultimate cognitive sensation depended upon an error, and for this experience, a fortunate misunderstanding became more useful than the disciplined alignment of mind to reality, how would such an ultimate sensation ever be understood? Not being understood, how could it be ultimate? If the ultimate degree of clarity could not house that ultimate sensation, but (for argument’s sake) accurately acknowledged the experience of clarity as the ultimate understanding, would such clarity redeem any disappointment with the sensation by merely being able to look down on more intense sensations of deluded superiority? Probably not. The belief and delight one has in “looking down on others” is the error and the temptation. The ultimate clarity requires this vigilant self-suspicion, lest we slip over authenticity for increased intensity.

Popular posts from this blog

the obstacle, aphorism 367, A Human Strategy by Matt Berry

A valuable book, A Human Strategy, aphorism 387

turning points, The Mechanics of Virtue, aphorism 322